- List of Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- Layout of the Report
- Part 1: Resettlement Today
- 1. How Resettlement has Developed and the Role of UNHCR
- 2. The Position of the European Commission: the start of discussion on resettlement in the European Union
- Table: US Resettlement Programme Ceilings and Admissions and Asylum Applications, 1992-2001
- Table: US Asylum Applications and Resettlement Arrivals: Top Ten countries of Origin, 2001
- 3. The Elements of a Resettlement Programme
- Table: Resettlement quotas and arrivals
- 4. Country Reports:
- u0095 Sweden
- u0095 Finland
- u0095 Denmark
- u0095 The Netherlands
- u0095 Ireland
- u0095 UK
- u0095 Spain
- u0095 Norway
- u0095 Iceland
- u0095 New Zealand
- u0095 Australia
- u0095 Canada
- Summary Table
- u0095 US
- Table: Ceilings, Admissions and Shortfalls, 1980-2002
- u0095 Latin America
- u0095 African States
- u0095 Other EU States
- u0095 Switzerland
- u0095 Some u0091lessonsu0092 drawn from country reviews
- 5. The Costing of Existing Refugee Resettlement Programmes
- 6. Fraud
- 7. The Legal Nature of Resettlement
- 8. Conclusions to Part 1 and Background to Part 2
- Part 2: Resettlement Tomorrow?
- 1. The Legal and Political Feasibility of Establishing an EU Resettlement Programme
- 2. The Relation to the Common Asylum System and Goal of a Common Asylum Procedure
- Graphic: Common European Asylum System
- Graphic: Common European International Protection System
- 3. Resettlement Programme Models: Subsidiarity
- Model One: Maintaining the Current System
- Model Two: Decision on the Principle of Resettlement
- Model Three: Common Decision to Resettle and How Many
- Model Four: Common Approach to Who and How Many
- European Clearing System for Resettlement
- Model Five: Common Pre-Arrival Programme
- Model Six: Totally Common Programme
- 4. Financing Resettlement
- European Refugee Resettlement Fund
- Private Sponsorship Prog
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10009637477