Support to Public Administrative and Judicial Capacity in Bulgaria and Romania : Thematic Evaluation Report of the European Union Phare Programme ; Phare from Pre-Accession to Accession

This report’s key objectives are to evaluate the contribution which the Phare programme has made to the transposition, implementation and enforcement of ‘horizontal’ Public Administrative and Judicial Capacity (PAJC) development in Bulgaria and Romania, and to identify lessons learned, draw conclusions and make recommendations relevant to the planning and management of Phare programming in Bulgaria and Romania and of support to other present and future candidates.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2006-12-14
Institutions:	ECOTEC Research and Consulting Limited, Birmingham ; Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung (contributor)
Subject:	Anpassung \| adaptation \| Bulgarien \| Bulgaria \| Entwicklungshilfe \| development aid \| EU \| EU-Beitritt \| joining of the European Union \| Finanzierung \| funding \| Förderungsprogramm \| promotional program \| Gerichtsverfahren \| legal proceedings \| Justizverwaltung \| judicial administration \| Kapazität \| capacity \| öffentliche Verwaltung \| public administration \| Rumänien \| Romania

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAIN REPORT
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Context
1.2. Objectives
1.3. Scope and methodology
2. STRATEGY,IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS STRATEGY
2.1. Phare Support Strategy for PAJC has not been strategically conceived
2.2. Support strategy has been embodied in Phare working documents
2.3. Recently, national strategies for PAJC have been prepared
2.4. Since 2002, the emphasis of Phare support to PAJC has shifted
2.5. Strategic requirements strain national administrative capacity
2.6. Candidates have not benefited from lessons learned in New Member States
IMPLEMENTATION
2.7. Phare has given substantial financial support to PAJC
2.8. PAJC horizontal topic coverage has been comprehensive
2.9. PAJC building is overloading national capacity
RESULTS
2.10. Interim Evaluation rates Phare projects slightly positive overall
2.11. Progress in horizontal PAJC has yet to reflect Phare’s ongoing contribution
3. REMAINING CHALLENGES
4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1. Conclusions
4.2. Recommendations
ANNEXES
Annex 1. Terms of Reference
Annex 2. Phare Programmes & Projects in PAJC Database
Annex 3. Phare Allocations for PAJC in Bulgaria and Romania; 1998-2006
Annex 4. Progression on horizontal PAJC issues in Bulgaria and Romania; 2002-05
Annex 5. Interim Evaluations covering PAJC Database Projects
Annex 6. Interim Evaluation Ratings
Annex 7. Persons Interviewed
Annex 8. Documentation

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476819