Tactical Asset Allocation with Commodity Futures : Implications of Business Cycle and Monetary Policy

While Gorton and Rouwenhorst (2005) suggest using business cycle in tactical asset allocation with commodity futures, Jensen et al (2002) suggest using monetary policy in guiding the timing of investment. We investigate whether it is useful to watch both.We find that clever timing in asset allocation, taking into account both business cycle and monetary policy, does perform better than either the Gorton and Rouwenhorst (2005) or Jensen et al (2002) strategies. This is true in-sample, also true out-of-sample, and significant - as long as one ignores announcement lags. In short, there is indeed an interaction effect between the effects of the two economic variables. However, the benefits from clever timing of one's asset allocation seem much reduced by the late announcement of the business cycle. When stand-alone trading in commodity futures is evaluated, actually, the strategies even underperform buy and hold. When optimal multi-asset portfolios are constructed, the news is not that negative: the combined allocation rule does offer. Still, even then the returns or standardized excess returns are not significantly better. We even find that static diversified portfolios with commodity futures do not have significantly higher returns and Sharpe ratios than static portfolios without commodity futures. In short, the earlier recommendations may have been too optimistic about the role of commodities for financial investment purposes