Taxonomy for science and engineering indicators: a reassessment
Science policy researchers and scientists themselves know reflexively that differences among scientific fields matter. However, sets of government-sponsored science and engineering (S&E) indicators are quite general and in most instances do not report differences among fields. We evaluate the current limitations of S&E indicators, identifying particular data needs about scientific fields. We suggest developing a disaggregated, flexible S&E classification. We argue that disaggregating S&E indicators through faceted analysis or webbed or networked databases will enable users to account for specialization, interdisciplinarity and emerging fields, and to adapt the S&E indicators across databases, making indicators more useful for international comparison. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Feeney, Mary Kathleen ; Bozeman, Barry |
Published in: |
Research Evaluation. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0958-2029. - Vol. 14.2005, 3, p. 239-248
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Mentoring women in the public sector: expectations and realities
Feeney, Mary Kathleen, (2006)
-
Mentoring women in the public sector: expectations and realities
Feeney, Mary Kathleen, (2006)
-
Mentoring: a tool for social and human capital learning
Feeney, Mary Kathleen, (2006)
- More ...