The DOJ Section 2 Report: It All Depends on Your Priors
hy do we have the antitrust rules that we have? While I was at the Federal Trade Commission (“FTCâ€Â), this was a question with which we often grappled. For instance, I had the pleasure of consulting with DG Competition regarding its discussion paper on the application of Article 82 to exclusionary abuses. As we and the DOJ examined the principles laid out in the discussion paper and compared them to our own, I was struck by the many differences. Why was it that very experienced agencies, often starting from the same premises, ended up with different conclusions? Why do we have the rules that we have while they have their rules? A senior DOJ economist offered the answer: It all depends on your priors.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Gates, Sean |
Published in: |
Antitrust Chronicle. - Competition Policy International. - Vol. 10.2008, 1
|
Publisher: |
Competition Policy International |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Evidence for Homeschooling : Constitutional Analysis in Light of Social Science Research
Dumas, Tanya K., (2008)
-
Antitrust and Rebates : A Study in Analogies
Gates, Sean, (2009)
-
Antitrust by Analogy : Developing Rules for Loyalty Rebates and Bundled Discounts
Gates, Sean, (2014)
- More ...