The end of power: a misguided conclusion

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the relationship between micropowers and megaplayers in organizations and society. It reflects on whether or not Moises Naim's notion of the “end of power” is logical given current developments in the global marketplace. Design/methodology/approach – The paper briefly discusses the concept of power in the context of history, organization, and international relations and provides a powerful argument against the notion of the coming end of power. Findings – Based on logical and historical perspectives, it is argued that the rise of micropowers does not mean an end of power. Rather, it constitutes a revival and flourishing of power under different circumstances. Six propositions are advanced to refute the notion of Naim's The End of Power . Originality/value – The paper offers a genuine reflection on the historical evolution of power and the necessity of power in personal, organizational, and international affairs. The paper sets the stage for an effective dialogue by which to recognize the essence of power, its dynamics, and deployment in a new environment.