The Return to Hours and Workers in U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence on Aggregation Bias
Reliance on overtime or part-time work is contested by organized labor and suggests employers exploit trade-offs between workers and hours. Worker–hour models predict return to hours and workers’ estimates are crucial in evaluating the trade-off between them. This paper uses data that vary by industry to test and reject a common production structure across industries used in prior work; this aggregation is shown to yield an upward bias in return-to-hours estimates. Contrary to prior evidence, the industry-specific return-to-hour estimates are lower than return-to-worker estimates and are generally less than one, suggesting that trade-offs between workers and hours may be cost effective.
Year of publication: |
1999
|
---|---|
Authors: | DeBeaumont, Ronald ; Larry D. Singell Jr. |
Published in: |
Southern Economic Journal. - Southern Economic Association - SEA. - Vol. 66.1999, 2, p. 336-352
|
Publisher: |
Southern Economic Association - SEA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Occupational differences in the wage penalty for obese women
DeBeaumont, Ronald, (2009)
-
Articles - The Return to Hours and Workers in US Manufacturing: Evidence on Aggregation Bias
DeBeaumont, Ronald, (1999)
-
Articles - The Return to Hours and Workers in US Manufacturing: Evidence on Aggregation Bias
DeBeaumont, Ronald, (1999)
- More ...