The Sensitivity of Tests of Asset Pricing Models to the "IID"-Normal Assumption: Contemporaneous Evidence from the US and UK Stock Markets
Standard tests of asset pricing models are based on the "iid"-normal assumption. We compare standard test results with those obtained from procedures that do not require "iid"-normality. Analysing unconditional and conditional asset pricing models, we find that the use of tests that consider departures from the "iid"-normal assumption affect probability values, sometimes by a considerable amount but that test outcomes are not affected. The results also suggest that issues surrounding the testing of joint hypothesis influence probability values and that the use of appropriate tests may be more important when analysing US data than when analysing UK data. Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001.
Year of publication: |
2001-06
|
---|---|
Authors: | Groenewald, Nicolaas ; Fraser, Patricia |
Published in: |
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 0306-686X. - Vol. 28.2001-06, 5-6, p. 771-798
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Forecasting Beta: How Well Does the 'Five-Year Rule of Thumb' Do?
Groenewald, Nicolaas, (2000)
-
Fraser, Patricia, (1995)
-
UK stock and government bond markets : predictability and the term structure
Fraser, Patricia, (1995)
- More ...