The Standard Error of Regressions
Statistical significance as used in economics has weak theoretical justification. In particular it merges statistical and substantive significance. The 182 papers using regression analysis in the American Economic Review in the 1980s were tested against 19 criteria for the accepted use of statistical significance. Most, some three-quarters of the papers, did poorly. Likewise, textbooks in econometrics do not distinguish statistical and economic significance. Statistical significance should not be the focus of empirical economics.
Year of publication: |
1996
|
---|---|
Authors: | McCloskey, Deirdre N. ; Ziliak, Stephen T. |
Published in: |
Journal of Economic Literature. - American Economic Association - AEA. - Vol. 34.1996, 1, p. 97-114
|
Publisher: |
American Economic Association - AEA |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Measurement and meaning in economics : the essential Deirdre McCloskey
McCloskey, Deirdre N., (2001)
-
We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer
Ziliak, Stephen T., (2013)
-
The Standard Error of Regressions
McCloskey, Deirdre N., (1996)
- More ...