The Theory of Institutional Change Revisited: The Institutional Dichotomy, Its Dynamic, and Its Policy Implications in a More Formal Analysis

The Theory of Institutional Change as elaborated by P.D. Bush in the tradition of Veblen, Ayres and J.F. Foster provided an important device for analysis, with its clarification of the <i>value bases</i> and of forms and dynamics of <i>value-behavior patterns.</i> Bush pushed institutionalism to a certain limit. Coming from different "galaxies," formal approaches, such as system dynamics, network analysis, graph theory, or game theory have been further developed by institutional and evolutionary economists in order to close <i>gaps</i> and to further operationalize, formalize, and develop institutionalism. This paper strives to demonstrate that we can bridge gaps between the theory of institutional change and an <i>evolutionary-institutional interpretation of game theory.</i> This allows for a deeper analysis of <i>institutions</i>, the <i>value base</i> in game theory, the instrumental-ceremonial <i>asymmetry, ceremonial dominance and encapsulation</i>, and the institutionalist <i>policy</i> conception. So, it is part of a broader project for the <i>extension of institutionalism's reach.</i>