Translating a CBDC Dollar Into a Constitutional Dollar

The constitutional Dollar was a silver coin. Federal and state paper moneys were unconstitutional, and gold and copper coins were not Dollars. Consequently, notable constitutional originalists claim any Dollar not constructed from silver – including the current widely circulating paper Federal Reserve note – is unconstitutional. But the Dollar soon may undergo an unprecedented technological metamorphosis: in 2022, the White House and the Federal Reserve Bank Board of Governors advocated the possible adoption of a U.S. Central Bank Digital Currency (“CBDC” Dollars). Private commercial electronic bank credits have been issued for some time, but a CBDC Dollar would be America’s first electronic government currency. Its anticipable legal tender status would obligate its nationwide use.Would a CBDC Dollar be constitutional? Originalism seems ill-equipped to answer. Digital money did not exist in 1792 and the Dollar has not been on a silver standard in practice since 1861 or statutorily since 1873. An originalist who calls for a return to universal transacting in actual silver coins rather than debit cards or smart phone swipes is more likely to draw snickers than assent. Perhaps originalism’s plausibility as the preferred interpretative method for constitutional money matters sags because contextual gaps between the antebellum and modern economies have grown too wide since the Constitution’s creation.To counter these concerns, this Article instead invokes the well-established “translator’s” form of constitutional interpretation. It concludes that the Founders would have welcomed the transactional ease of CBDC Dollars and would not have immediately dismissed the CBDC Dollar as unconstitutional simply because the CBDC Dollar is not silver weighing 371.25 grains fine. The translator’s method of interpretation does admit the possibility that CBDC Dollars could be constitutional, but to be so, they would have to be designed in a specific way (discussed herein) to preserve the original constitutional understanding that a United States Dollar is a non-inflationary currency, and not a government bond. Thus, necessary, but not necessarily sufficient, conditions for a constitutional CBDC Dollar are that it will not be interest-bearing and it will be immediately redeemable for a specific constitutional silver Dollar. Finally, it is emphasized that this article does not examine whether a CBDC Dollar would violate constitutional privacy rights