Urban politics and the production of capital mobility in the United States
In the quest to explain changing urban political economic conditions over the past thirty years urban researchers have naturalized capital mobility, to the point where challenging the mobility of capital appears either impossible, undesirable, or both. In this paper I aim to denaturalize capital mobility and to repoliticize the relationship between capital and place through a critical legal geographic investigation of corporate mobility rights in the United States. The overall goal is to help urban researchers to think critically about the politics of capital mobility and to ensure that the legal principles enabling capital mobility remain open to challenge from alternative political perspectives.
| Year of publication: |
2009
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Pendras, Mark |
| Published in: |
Environment and Planning A. - Pion Ltd, London, ISSN 1472-3409. - Vol. 41.2009, 7, p. 1691-1706
|
| Publisher: |
Pion Ltd, London |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
From local consciousness to global change: asserting power at the local scale
Pendras, Mark, (2002)
-
Why the Garden Club Couldn't Save Youngstown: The Transformation of the Rust Belt - By Sean Safford
Pendras, Mark, (2010)
-
Urban politics and the production of capital mobility in the United States
Pendras, Mark, (2009)
- More ...