Using Repayment Data to Test Across Models of Joint Liability Lending
Theories rationalising joint liability lending are rich in implications for repayment rates. We exploit this fact to test four diverse models. We show that the models' repayment implications do not always coincide. For example, higher correlation of output and borrowers' ability to act cooperatively can raise or lower repayment, depending on the model. Data from Thai borrowing groups suggest that repayment is affected negatively by the joint liability rate ("ceteris paribus") and social ties, and positively by the strength of local sanctions and correlated returns. Further, the relative fit of the adverse selection versus informal sanctions models varies by region. Copyright 2007 The Author(s). Journal compilation Royal Economic Society 2007.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ahlin, Christian ; Townsend, RobertM. |
Published in: |
Economic Journal. - Royal Economic Society - RES, ISSN 1468-0297. - Vol. 117.2007, 517, p. 11-11
|
Publisher: |
Royal Economic Society - RES |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Economic theory meets evidence in rural Thailand : lessons for group lending
Ahlin, Christian, (2010)
-
Matching for credit : risk and diversification in Thai microcredit groups
Ahlin, Christian, (2009)
-
Group formation with fixed group size : complementarity vs substitutability
Ahlin, Christian, (2012)
- More ...