Voting, Spatial Monopoly, and Spatial Price Regulation.
Regulations often require that local public utilities engage in high rates of freight absorption. These regulations, often mandating uniform pricing, are shown to arise logically as a consequence of self-interested voting behavior. The authors specifically consider the case of a single-plant spatial monopoly that is regulated by consumers distributed around the plant. Consumers may change their delivered price by voting to require a rate of freight absorption that differs from the profit-maximizing rate. Voting outcomes under a median voter model predict the high rate of freight absorption often observed in practice. Copyright 1992 by Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
1992
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ye, Meng-Hua ; Yezer, Anthony M J |
Published in: |
Economic Inquiry. - Western Economic Association International - WEAI. - Vol. 30.1992, 1, p. 29-39
|
Publisher: |
Western Economic Association International - WEAI |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Benefits and Costs of Legal Restrictions on Personal Loan Markets.
Barth, James R, (1986)
-
Yezer, Anthony M J, (1994)
-
An Analysis of Informational Restrictions on the Lending Decisions of Financial Institutions.
Barth, James R, (1983)
- More ...