What About the Bell-shaped Relationship Between Primacy and Development?
This paper proposes, estimates, and tests a “no-frills†static two-equation recursive model, where the size of the largest city depends on the level of development in a two-step relationship, with the total urban population intervening as an intermediate variable. The model has the following implications for primacy: (1) contrary to Richardson and Schwartz's (1988) assertion, primacy is indeed related to development, albeit indirectly, but (2) the relationship does not display the bell shape predicted by the El-Shakhs-Mera hypothesis. Instead, primacy as a function of development decreases monotonically at a decreasing rate. Research assistance was provided by Atib Salhi.
Year of publication: |
1995
|
---|---|
Authors: | Lemelin, André ; Polèse, Mario |
Published in: |
International Regional Science Review. - Vol. 18.1995, 3, p. 313-330
|
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
What About the Bell-shaped Relationship Between Primacy and Development?
Lemelin, André, (1995)
-
What about the bell-shaped relationship between primacy and development?
Lemelin, André, (1995)
-
Développement économique, urbanisation et concentration urbaine : essai de synthèse
Lemelin, André, (1992)
- More ...