What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment?
Experimental estimates from Moving to Opportunity (MTO) show no significant impacts of moves to lowerâ€poverty neighborhoods on adult economic selfâ€sufficiency four to seven years after random assignment. The authors disagree with Clampetâ€Lundquist and Massey's claim that MTO was a weak intervention and therefore uninformative about neighborhood effects. MTO produced large changes in neighborhood environments that improved adult mental health and many outcomes for young females. Clampetâ€Lundquist and Massey's claim that MTO experimental estimates are plagued by selection bias is erroneous. Their new nonexperimental estimates are uninformative because they add back the selection problems that MTO's experimental design was intended to overcome.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Katz, Lawrence ; Duncan, Greg J. ; Kling, Jeffrey R. ; Kessler, Ronald C. ; Ludwig, Jens ; Sanbonmatsu, Lisa ; Liebman, Jeffrey B. |
Institutions: | Department of Economics, Harvard University |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults
Ludwig, Jens, (2012)
-
Neighborhoods, Obesity and Diabetes –-- A Randomized Social Experiment
Duncan, Greg J., (2011)
-
Harding, David J., (2021)
- More ...