What Do Stock Splits Really Signal?
We observe significant post-split excess returns of 7.93 percent in the first year and 12.15 percent in the first three years for a sample of 1,275 two-for-one stock splits. These excess returns follow an announcement return of 3.38 percent, indicating that the market underreacts to split announcements. The evidence suggests that splits realign prices to a lower trading range, but managers self-select by conditioning the decision to split on expected future performance. Presplit runup and post-split excess returns are inversely related, indicating that our results are not caused by momentum.
Year of publication: |
1996
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ikenberry, David L. ; Rankine, Graeme ; Stice, Earl K. |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 31.1996, 03, p. 357-375
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
What do stock splits really signal?
Ikenberry, David, (1996)
-
What Do Stock Splits Really Signal?
Ikenberry, David L., (1996)
-
What Do Stock Splits Really Signal?
Ikenberry, David, (1998)
- More ...