What is the best way to impede a central bank?
Recent work has found several ways of restricting central bank behavior to achieve much of the gain of commitment over discretion. This paper compares three such impediments: A quadratic penalty on interest rate changes, a fixed penalty on any rate change, and forced infrequency of rate change. All three achieve significant improvement over discretion, and often come close to interest rate rule commitment. The fixed penalty is frequently the best performing restriction, although the quadratic penalty does best in certain alternative parameterizations. Combinations are found to provide no improvement over the individual impediments alone.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | VanderHart, Peter G. |
Published in: |
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. - Elsevier, ISSN 1062-9769. - Vol. 49.2009, 3, p. 784-797
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Subject: | Monetary policy Commitment Discretion |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The housing decisions of elderly homeowners
VanderHart, Peter G., (1995)
-
The housing decisions of older households : a dynamic analysis
VanderHart, Peter G., (1998)
-
The Federal Reserve's reaction function under Greenspan : an ordinal probit analysis
VanderHart, Peter G., (2000)
- More ...