Why are most Funds Open-end? Competition and the Limits of Arbitrage
The majority of asset-management intermediaries (e.g., mutual funds, hedge funds) are structured on an open-end basis, even though it appears that the open-end form can be a serious impediment to arbitrage. I argue that when funds compete to attract investors' dollars, the equilibrium degree of open-ending in an economy can be excessive from the point of view of these investors. One implication of the analysis is that, even absent short-sales constraints or other frictions, economically large mispricings can coexist with rational, competitive arbitrageurs who earn small excess returns. © 2005 MIT Press
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Stein, Jeremy C. |
Published in: |
The Quarterly Journal of Economics. - MIT Press. - Vol. 120.2005, 1, p. 247-272
|
Publisher: |
MIT Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Information production and capital allocation : decentralized vs. hierarchical firms
Stein, Jeremy C., (2000)
-
Stein, Jeremy C., (1995)
-
Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources
Stein, Jeremy C., (1995)
- More ...