Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors?
Companies actively seek to appoint outside CEOs to their boards. Consistent with our matching theory of outside CEO board appointments, we show that such appointments have a certification benefit for the appointing firm. CEOs are more likely to join boards of large established firms that are geographically close, pursue similar financial and investment policies, and have comparable governance to their own firms. The first outside CEO director appointment has a higher stock-price reaction than the appointment of another outside director. Except for a decrease in operating performance following the appointment of an interlocked director, CEO directors do not affect the appointing firm's operating performance, decision-making, and CEO compensation.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger ; Low, Angie ; Stulz, René M. |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0304-405X. - Vol. 97.2010, 1, p. 12-32
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Director independence New director appointment Director influence Interlocked boards Governance |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Dark Side of Outside Directors: Do they Quit When They are Most Needed?
Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger, (2010)
-
The dark side of outside directors: Do they quit when they are most needed?
Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger, (2010)
-
Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors?
Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger, (2010)
- More ...