Why Don't Poor Countries Catch Up? A Cross-National Test of Institutional Explanation.
Early neoclassical analyses predicted that poor countries would grow faster than wealthy countries because of technological advances and diminishing returns to capital in the latter. The reverse has occurred: poor countries are falling back rather than catching up. The authors suggest here that deficient institutions underlie this divergence. Employing various indicators of institutional quality, including the rule of law, the pervasiveness of corruption, and the risk of expropriation and contract repudiation, they show that the ability of poor countries to catch up is determined in large part by the institutional environment in which economic activity in these countries takes place. Copyright 1997 by Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Keefer, Philip ; Knack, Stephen |
Published in: |
Economic Inquiry. - Western Economic Association International - WEAI. - Vol. 35.1997, 3, p. 590-602
|
Publisher: |
Western Economic Association International - WEAI |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Knack, Stephen, (1995)
-
Social capital, social norms and the New Institutional Economics
Keefer, Philip, (2003)
-
Does inequality harm growth only in democracies? A replication and extension
Knack, Stephen, (1996)
- More ...