EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 91 - 100 of 528
Cover Image
Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect
Connolly, Terry; Reb, Jochen; Kausel, Edgar E. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 2, pp. 136-149
Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010633328
Saved in:
Cover Image
Risky choice in younger versus older adults: Affective context matters
Huang, Yumi; Wood, Stacey; Berger, Dale; Hanoch, Yaniv - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 2, pp. 179-187
Earlier frameworks have indicated that older adults tend to experience decline in their deliberative decisional capacity, while their affective abilities tend to remain intact (Peters, Hess, Vastfjall, and Auman, 2007). The present study applied this framework to the study of risky...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010633330
Saved in:
Cover Image
Top scores are possible, bottom scores are certain (and middle scores are not worth mentioning): A pragmatic view of verbal probabilities
Juanchich, Marie; Teigen, Karl Halvor; Am\'elie Gourdon - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 345-364
In most previous studies of verbal probabilities, participants are asked to translate expressions such as possible and not certain into numeric probability values. This probabilistic translation approach can be contrasted with a novel which-outcome (WO) approach that focuses on the outcomes that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661308
Saved in:
Cover Image
I can take the risk, but you should be safe: Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety
Stone, Eric R.; Choi, YoonSun; Bruin, Wandi Bruine de; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 250-267
Prior research on self-other differences involving risk have found that individuals make riskier decisions for others than for the self in situations where risk taking is valued. We expand this research by examining whether the direction of self-other differences reverses when risk aversion is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661309
Saved in:
Cover Image
Inferring uncertainty from interval estimates: Effects of alpha level and numeracy
Rinne, Luke F.; Mazzocco, Michele M. M. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 330-344
Interval estimates are commonly used to descriptively communicate the degree of uncertainty in numerical values. Conventionally, low alpha levels (e.g., .05) ensure a high probability of capturing the target value between interval endpoints. Here, we test whether alpha levels and individual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661310
Saved in:
Cover Image
Validation of the Adult Decision-Making Competence in Slovak students
Bavolar, Jozef - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 386-392
A study using a high school and college sample (age 18--26) was conducted to validate the Slovak version of the Adult Decision-Making Competence. The results were similar to findings reported by Bruine de Bruin, Parker, and Fischhoff (2007) on the adult population in America. The internal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661311
Saved in:
Cover Image
The environment matters: Comparing individuals and dyads in their adaptive use of decision strategies
Kaemmer, Juliane E.; Gaissmaier, Wolfgang; Czienskowski, Uwe - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 299-329
Individuals have been shown to adaptively select decision strategies depending on the environment structure. Two experiments extended this research to the group level. Subjects (N = 240) worked either individually or in two-person groups, or dyads, on a multi-attribute paired-comparison task....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661312
Saved in:
Cover Image
On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications
Ert, Eyal; Erev, Ido - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 214-235
Previous studies of loss aversion in decisions under risk have led to mixed results. Losses appear to loom larger than gains in some settings, but not in others. The current paper clarifies these results by highlighting six experimental manipulations that tend to increase the likelihood of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661313
Saved in:
Cover Image
Deliberation versus automaticity in decision making: Which presentation format features facilitate automatic decision making?
Soellner, Anke; Broeder, Arndt; Hilbig, Benjamin E. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 278-298
The idea of automatic decision making approximating normatively optimal decisions without necessitating much cognitive effort is intriguing. Whereas recent findings support the notion that such fast, automatic processes explain empirical data well, little is known about the conditions under...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661314
Saved in:
Cover Image
The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely
Eriksson, Kimmo; Simpson, Brent - In: Judgment and Decision Making 8 (2013) 3, pp. 395-396
In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010661315
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...