EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 161 - 170 of 528
Cover Image
"Leaving it to chance"-Passive risk taking in everyday life
Keinan, Ruty; Bereby-Meyer, Yoella - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 6, pp. 705-715
While risk research focuses on actions that put people at risk, this paper introduces the concept of ``passive risk''---risk brought on or magnified by inaction. We developed a scale measuring personal tendency for passive risk taking (PRT), validated it using a 150 undergraduate student sample,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618024
Saved in:
Cover Image
The impact of near-miss events on betting behavior: An examination of casino rapid roulette play
Sundali, James A.; Safford, Amanda H.; Croson, Rachel - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 6, pp. 768-778
We examine how almost winning in roulette affects subsequent betting behavior. Our main finding is heterogeneity in gambler behavior with some gamblers less likely to bet on numbers that were near misses on the prior spin and other gamblers more likely to bet on near miss numbers. Using a unique...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618025
Saved in:
Cover Image
Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
Starcke, Katrin; Ludwig, Anne-Catrin; Brand, Matthias - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 1, pp. 61-68
A recent study indicates that acute stress affects moral decision making (Youssef et al., in press). The current study examines whether results can be replicated using a different kind of stressor and a different kind of stress measurement. We induced stress in 25 participants with a cover-story...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618026
Saved in:
Cover Image
Predicting (un)healthy behavior: A comparison of risk-taking propensity measures
Szrek, Helena; Chao, Li-Wei; Ramlagan, Shandir; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 6, pp. 716-727
We compare four different risk-taking propensity measures on their ability to describe and to predict actual risky behavior in the domain of health. The risk-taking propensity measures we compare are: (1) a general measure of risk-taking propensity derived from a one-item survey question (Dohmen...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618027
Saved in:
Cover Image
Debiasing egocentrism and optimism biases in repeated competitions
Rose, Jason P.; Windschitl, Paul D.; Smith, Andrew R. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 6, pp. 761-767
When judging their likelihood of success in competitive tasks, people tend to be overoptimistic for easy tasks and overpessimistic for hard tasks (the shared circumstance effect; SCE). Previous research has shown that feedback and experience from repeated-play competitions has a limited impact...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618028
Saved in:
Cover Image
When a risky prospect is valued more than its best possible outcome
Drichoutis, Andreas C.; Nayga, Rodolfo M.; Lusk, Jayson L. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 1, pp. 1-18
In this paper, we document a violation of normative and descriptive models of decision making under risk. In contrast to uncertainty effects found by Gneezy, List and Wu (2006), some subjects in our experiments valued lotteries more than the best possible outcome. We show that the overbidding...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618029
Saved in:
Cover Image
Why are lotteries valued less? Multiple tests of a direct risk-aversion mechanism
Newman, George E.; Mochon, Daniel - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 1, pp. 19-24
Recent studies have identified the uncertainty effect (UE), whereby risky prospects (e.g., a binary lottery that offers either a $50 or $100 gift certificate) are valued less than their worst possible outcome (a $50 certificate). This effect has been proposed to result from ``direct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618030
Saved in:
Cover Image
The tyranny of choice: a cross-cultural investigation of maximizing-satisfising effects on well-being
Roets, Arne; Schwartz, Barry; Guan, Yanjun - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 6, pp. 689-704
The present research investigated the relationship between individual differences in maximizing versus satisficing (i.e., seeking to make the single best choice, rather than a choice that is merely good enough) and well-being, in interaction with the society in which an individual lives. Data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618031
Saved in:
Cover Image
Is that the answer you had in mind? The effect of perspective on unethical behavior
Schurr, Amos; Ritov, Ilana; Kareev, Yaakov; Avrahami, Judith - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 6, pp. 679-688
We explored how the perspective through which individuals view their actions influences their ethicality, comparing a narrow perspective that allows for evaluation of each choice in isolation, to a broad perspective that promotes an aggregate view of one's choices. To examine unethical behavior...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618032
Saved in:
Cover Image
The Maximization Inventory
Turner, Brandon M.; Rim, Hye Bin; Betz, Nancy E.; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2012) 1, pp. 48-60
We present the Maximization Inventory, which consists of three separate scales: decision difficulty, alternative search, and satisficing. We show that the items of the Maximization Inventory have much better psychometric properties when compared to the original Maximization Scale (Schwartz et...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010618033
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...