EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 201 - 210 of 528
Cover Image
Real and hypothetical rewards in self-control and social discounting
Locey, Matthew L.; Jones, Bryan A.; Rachlin, Howard - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 6, pp. 552-564
Laboratory studies of choice and decision making among real monetary rewards typically use smaller real rewards than those common in real life. When laboratory rewards are large, they are almost always hypothetical. In applying laboratory results meaningfully to real-life situations, it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009283779
Saved in:
Cover Image
The size and distribution of donations: Effects of number of recipients
Soyer, Emre; Hogarth, Robin M. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 616-628
Whereas much literature exists on ``choice overload'', less is known about effects of numbers of alternatives in donation decisions. We hypothesize that donations increase with the number of recipients, albeit at a decreasing rate, and reflect donors' knowledge of the recipients. Donations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353466
Saved in:
Cover Image
An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate
Swirsky, Chloe L.; Fernbach, Philip M.; Sloman, Steven A. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 688-696
The tempting fate effect is that the probability of a fateful outcome is deemed higher following an action that ``tempts'' the outcome than in the absence of such an action. In this paper we evaluate the hypothesis that the effect is due to an illusion of control induced by a causal framing of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353467
Saved in:
Cover Image
Who makes utilitarian judgments? The influences of emotions on utilitarian judgments
Choe, So Young; Min, Kyung-Hwan - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 580-592
Recent research has emphasized emotion's role in non-utilitarian judgments, but has not focused much on characteristics of subjects contributing to those judgments. The present article relates utilitarian judgment to individual disposition to experience various emotions. Study 1 first...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353468
Saved in:
Cover Image
Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations
Kriss, Peter H.; Loewenstein, George; Wang, Xianghong; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 602-615
Slowing climate change will almost certainly require a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, but agreement on who should reduce emissions by how much is difficult, in part because of the self-serving bias---the tendency to believe that what is beneficial to oneself is also fair. Conducting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353469
Saved in:
Cover Image
What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis
Leite, Fabio P.; Ratcliff, Roger - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 651-687
We used a diffusion model to examine the effects of response-bias manipulations on response time (RT) and accuracy data collected in two experiments involving a two-choice decision making task. We asked 18 subjects to respond ``low'' or ``high'' to the number of asterisks in a 10x10 grid, based...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353470
Saved in:
Cover Image
Trust and self-control: The moderating role of the default
Evans, Anthony M.; Dillon, Kyle D.; Goldin, Gideon; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 697-705
According to recent dual-process theories, interpersonal trust is influenced by both impulsive and deliberative processes. The present research explores the determinants of deliberative trust, investigating how trust decisions are affected by the availability of cognitive resources. We test the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353471
Saved in:
Cover Image
The impact of excess choice on deferment of decisions to volunteer
Carroll, Lauren S.; White, Mathew P.; Pahl, Sabine - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 629-637
Excess choice has previously been shown to have detrimental effects on decisions about consumer products. As the number of options increases, people are more likely to put off making an active choice (i.e., defer) and show less satisfaction with any purchase actually made. We extend this line of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353472
Saved in:
Cover Image
Numeracy as a precursor to pro-social behavior: The impact of numeracy and presentation format on the cognitive mechanisms underlying donation decisions
Dickert, Stephan; Kleber, Janet; Peters, Ellen; Slovic, Paul - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 638-650
Donation requests often convey numerical information about the people in need. In two studies we investigated the effects of numeracy and presentation format on the underlying affective and cognitive mechanisms of donation decisions. In Study 1, participants were presented with information about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353473
Saved in:
Cover Image
Trolley problems in context
Shallow, Christopher; Iliev, Rumen; Medin, Douglas - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 7, pp. 593-601
Would you redirect a trolley to save five people even if it means that the trolley will run over a person on the side track? Most people say they would. Would you push that same person into the path of the trolley in order to save the five? Most people say they would not. These sorts of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009353474
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...