Search Results - isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"

Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process

Koop, Gregory J.; Johnson, Joseph G. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 750-758

The history of judgment and decision making is defined by a trend toward increasingly nuanced explanations of the …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009401046

Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making

Lee, Michael D.; Newell, Benjamin R. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 832-842

Hierarchical Bayesian methods offer a principled and comprehensive way to relate psychological models to data. Here we use them to model the patterns of information search, stopping and deciding in a simulated binary comparison judgment task. The simulation involves 20 subjects making 100 forced...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009401047

Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research

Glockner, Andreas; Hilbig, Benjamin E. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 705-710

In this introduction to the special issue on methodology, we provide background on its original motivation and a systematic overview of the contributions. The latter are discussed with correspondence to the phase of the scientific process they (most strongly) refer to: Theory construction,...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404601

Herbert Simonâ€™s spell on judgment and decision making

Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V.; Cherng-Horng (Dan) Lan - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 722-732

How many judgment and decision making (JDM) researchers have not claimed to be building on Herbert Simon's work? We … relates to these goals, we analyzed the articles published in the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and in Judgment and … Decision Making from 2006 to 2010. Out of 377 articles, 91 cite Simon or we judged them as directly relating to his goals. We …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404602

Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?

Renkewitz, Frank; Fuchs, Heather M.; Fiedler, Susann - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 870-881

, biology) are aware of the problem, and have identified strong publication biases, researchers in judgment and decision making …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404603

Measuring social value orientation

Murphy, Ryan O.; Ackerman, Kurt A.; Handgraaf, Michel J. J. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 771-781

Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404604

Methodological notes on model comparisons and strategy classification: A falsificationist proposition

Moshagen, Morten; Hilbig, Benjamin E. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 814-820

Taking a falsificationist perspective, the present paper identifies two major shortcomings of existing approaches to comparative model evaluations in general and strategy classifications in particular. These are (1) failure to consider systematic error and (2) neglect of global model fit. Using...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404605

The Empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies

Glockner, Andreas; Betsch, Tilmann - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 711-721

empirical content of theories in Judgment and Decision Making (JDM) and identify the challenges in theory formulation for …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404607

Pair-wise comparisons of multiple models

Broomell, Stephen B.; Budescu, David V.; Por, Han-Hui - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 821-831

Often research in judgment and decision making requires comparison of multiple competing models. Researchers invoke …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404608

The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making

Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Kuhberger, Anton; Ranyard, Rob - In: Judgment and Decision Making 6 (2011) 8, pp. 733-739

models of judgment and decision making (JDM). We draw on our experience of editing the ``Handbook of process tracing methods …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404609