EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 361 - 370 of 528
Cover Image
The coexistence of overestimation and underweighting of rare events and the contingent recency effect
Barron, Greg; Yechiam, Eldad - In: Judgment and Decision Making 4 (2009) 6, pp. 447-460
Previous research demonstrates overestimation of rare events in judgment tasks, and underweighting of rare events in decisions from experience. The current paper presents three laboratory experiments and a field study that explore this pattern. The results suggest that the overestimation and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008578207
Saved in:
Cover Image
From group diffusion to ratio bias: Effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments
Price, Paul C.; Matthews, Teri V. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 4 (2009) 6, pp. 436-446
The group-diffusion effect is the tendency for people to judge themselves to be less likely to experience a negative outcome as the total number of people exposed to the threat increases --- even when the probability of the outcome is explicitly presented (Yamaguchi, 1998). In Experiment 1 we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008578208
Saved in:
Cover Image
Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
Larson, Tara; Capra, C. Monica - In: Judgment and Decision Making 4 (2009) 6, pp. 467-474
We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang's (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a ``costless'' way --- the click of a button --- to ignore the consequences of their actions on others' payoffs, they chose to remain ignorant and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008578209
Saved in:
Cover Image
A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation
Reimers, Stian - In: Judgment and Decision Making 4 (2009) 6, pp. 461-466
Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public's taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences for progressiveness depend on the framing of the question asked....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008602741
Saved in:
Cover Image
The retrospective gambler's fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes
Oppenheimer, Daniel M.; Monin, Benoit - In: Judgment and Decision Making 4 (2009) 5, pp. 326-334
The gambler's fallacy (Tune, 1964) refers to the belief that a streak is more likely to end than chance would dictate. In three studies, participants exhibited a \textit{retrospective gambler's fallacy} (RGF) in which an event that seems rare appears to come from a longer sequence than an event...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005108377
Saved in:
Cover Image
The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making
Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger; Böhm, Gisela - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) January, pp. 5-17
A four-fold classification of emotions with respect to their functions in decision making is proposed. It is argued that emotions are not homogenous concerning their role in decision making, but that four distinct functions can be distinguished concerning emotional phenomena. One function is to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005000609
Saved in:
Cover Image
Frequency formats, probability formats, or problem structure? A test of the nested-sets hypothesis in an extensional reasoning task
Neace, William P.; Michaud, Steven; Bolling, Lauren; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) February, pp. 140-152
Five experiments addressed a controversy in the probability judgment literature that centers on the efficacy of framing probabilities as frequencies. The natural frequency view predicts that frequency formats attenuate errors, while the nested-sets view predicts that highlighting the set-subset...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005000610
Saved in:
Cover Image
Anticipated and experienced emotions in environmental risk perception
Böhm, Gisela; Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) January, pp. 73-86
Affective forecasting with respect to two environmental risks (ozone depletion, air pollution) was investigated by studying tourists who travelled to either Australia or Bangkok and were thus confronted with one of these risks. We measured anticipated outcome and anticipated emotions before the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005000611
Saved in:
Cover Image
Introduction to the special issue: Intuition and affect in risk perception and decision making
Boehm, Gisela; Brun, Wibecke - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) January, pp. 1-4
(from the introduction) Intuition and affect have been neglected topics in the literature on human judgment and … decision making for a long time. Judgmental processes involved in risk perception and decision making have traditionally been …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005000612
Saved in:
Cover Image
The psychology of moral reasoning
Bucciarelli, Monica; Khemlani, Sangeet; Johnson-Laird, P. N. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) February, pp. 121-139
This article presents a theory of reasoning about moral propositions that is based on four fundamental principles. First, no simple criterion picks out propositions about morality from within the larger set of deontic propositions concerning what is permissible and impermissible in social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005575032
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...