EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 31 - 40 of 528
Cover Image
Lay understanding of probability distributions
Goldstein, Daniel G.; Rothschild, David - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 1, pp. 1-14
How accurate are laypeople's intuitions about probability distributions of events? The economic and psychological literatures provide opposing answers. A classical economic view assumes that ordinary decision makers consult perfect expectations, while recent psychological research has emphasized...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735458
Saved in:
Cover Image
Foreground-background salience effect in traffic risk communication
Hu, Tian-Yi; Jiang, Xin-Wen; Xie, Xiaofei; Ma, Xiao-Qin; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 1, pp. 83-89
Pie charts are often used to communicate risk, such as the risk of driving. In the foreground-background salience effect (FBSE), foreground (probability of bad event) has greater salience than background (no bad event) in such a chart. Experiment 1 confirmed that the displays format of pie...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735459
Saved in:
Cover Image
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition
Ghazal, Saima; Cokely, Edward T.; Garcia-Retamero, Rocio - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 1, pp. 15-34
We investigated the relations between numeracy and superior judgment and decision making in two large community … and decision making because they simultaneously assess (1) mathematical competency and (2) metacognitive and self ….g., less overconfidence). Results suggest that well-designed numeracy tests tend to be robust predictors of superior judgment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735460
Saved in:
Cover Image
Does menu design influence retirement investment choices? Evidence from Italian occupational pension funds
Lippi, Andrea - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 1, pp. 77-82
Previous research has demonstrated that consumers' decisions regarding supplementary pensions could be affected by biases. Bernatzi and Thaler's experiment demonstrated that menu design can influence pension fund enrollment decisions, in that participants appear to adopt a na\"ive heuristic,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735461
Saved in:
Cover Image
Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions
Glockner, Andreas; Broder, Arndt - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 1, pp. 35-50
Gloeckner and Broeder (2011) have shown that for 77.5% of their participants' decision making behavior in decisions involving recognition information and explicitly provided additional cues could be better described by weighted-compensatory Parallel Constraint Satisfaction (PCS) Models than by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735462
Saved in:
Cover Image
Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems
Gold, Natalie; Colman, Andrew M.; Pulford, Briony D. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 1, pp. 65-76
Trolley problems have been used in the development of moral theory and the psychological study of moral judgments and behavior. Most of this research has focused on people from the West, with implicit assumptions that moral intuitions should generalize and that moral psychology is universal....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735463
Saved in:
Cover Image
Introducing upfront losses as well as gains decreases impatience in intertemporal choices with rewards
Jiang, Cheng-Ming; Hu, Feng-Pei; Zhu, Long-Fei - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 4, pp. 297-302
People tend to prefer smaller and sooner (SS) rewards over larger and later (LL) ones even when the latter are much larger. Previous research have identified several ways to enhance people's patience. Adding to this literature, the current paper demonstrates that introduction of upfront losses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812074
Saved in:
Cover Image
Responsibility judgments of wins and losses in the 2013 chess championship
Nordbye, Gro Hege Haraldsen; Teigen, Karl Halvor - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 4, pp. 335-348
We report two studies on the perceived responsibility of opponents competing for a goal that can be attained by only one of them. Responsibility judgments were collected in seven samples of lay people and experts before, during, and after the World Chess Championship in 2013. Participants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812075
Saved in:
Cover Image
Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas
Attari, Shahzeen Z.; Krantz, David H.; Weber, Elke U. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 4, pp. 316-334
Interventions to increase cooperation in social dilemmas depend on understanding decision makers' motivations for cooperation or defection. We examined these in five real-world social dilemmas: situations where private interests are at odds with collective ones. An online survey (N = 929) asked...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812076
Saved in:
Cover Image
Using metacognitive cues to infer others' thinking
Mata, André; Almeida, Tiago - In: Judgment and Decision Making 9 (2014) 4, pp. 349-359
Three studies tested whether people use cues about the way other people think---for example, whether others respond fast vs. slow---to infer what responses other people might give to reasoning problems. People who solve reasoning problems using deliberative thinking have better insight than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812077
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...