EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 391 - 400 of 528
Cover Image
How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory
Bonner, Carissa; Newell, Ben R. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) June, pp. 411-416
Which statement conveys greater risk: ``100 people die from cancer every day'' or ``36,500 people die from cancer every year''? In statistics where both frequencies and temporal information are used to convey risk, two theories predict opposite answers to this question. Construal level theory...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773080
Saved in:
Cover Image
Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor
Bröder, Arndt; Newell, Ben - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) March, pp. 205-214
The authors review their own empirical work inspired by the adaptive toolbox metaphor. The review examines factors influencing strategy selection and execution in multi-attribute inference tasks (e.g., information costs, time pressure, memory retrieval, dynamic environments, stimulus formats,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773083
Saved in:
Cover Image
The Regret/Disappointment Scale: An instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making
Marcatto, Francesco; Ferrante, Donatella - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) January, pp. 87-99
The present article investigates the effectiveness of methods traditionally used to distinguish between the emotions of regret and disappointment and presents a new method --- the Regret and Disappointment Scale (RDS) --- for assessing the two emotions in decision making research. The validity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773086
Saved in:
Cover Image
Modeling sequential context effects in judgment analysis: A time series approach
Beckstead, Jason W. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) 7, pp. 570-584
In this article a broad perspective incorporating elements of time series theory is presented for conceptualizing the data obtained in multi-trial judgment experiments. Recent evidence suggests that sequential context effects, assimilation and contrast, commonly found in psychophysical judgment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773088
Saved in:
Cover Image
Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options
Peters, Ellen; Levin, Irwin P. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) 6, pp. 435-448
Using five variants of the Asian Disease Problem, we dissected the risky-choice framing effect by requiring each participant to provide preference ratings for the full decision problem and also to provide attractiveness ratings for each of the component parts, i.e., the sure-thing option and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773092
Saved in:
Cover Image
New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis
Acker, Felix - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) April, pp. 292-303
Ninety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al.\ (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative decision making performance than conscious thought, which is contrary to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773094
Saved in:
Cover Image
Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation
Reisen, Nils; Hoffrage, Ulrich; Mast, Fred W. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) 8, pp. 641-658
In two studies on mobile phone purchase decisions, we investigated consumers' decision strategies with a newly developed process tracing tool called \textit{InterActive Process Tracing} (IAPT). This tool is a combination of several process tracing techniques (Active Information Search, Mouselab,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773095
Saved in:
Cover Image
Decision making in civil disputes: The effects of legal role, frame, and perceived chance of winning
Gilliland, Victoria; Dunn, John C. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) 7, pp. 512-527
The present study investigates the effect of framing and legal role on the propensity to accept a settlement offer by litigants in a simulated legal dispute. Participants were given four different scenarios that factorially combined legal role (plaintiff vs.\ defendant) and frame (positive vs.\...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773097
Saved in:
Cover Image
Who helps more? How self-other discrepancies influence decisions in helping situations
Kogut, Tehila; Beyth-Marom, Ruth - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) 8, pp. 595-606
Research has shown that people perceive themselves as less biased than others, and as better than average in many favorable characteristics. We suggest that these types of biased perceptions regarding intentions and behavior of others may directly affect people's decisions. In the current...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773098
Saved in:
Cover Image
An ecological perspective to cognitive limits: Modeling environment-mind interactions with ACT-R
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang; Schooler, Lael J.; Mata, Rui - In: Judgment and Decision Making 3 (2008) March, pp. 278-291
Contrary to the common belief that more information is always better, Gigerenzer et al.\ (1999) showed that simple decision strategies which rely on little information can be quite successful. The success of simple strategies depends both on bets about the structure of the environment and on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773100
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...