EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Judgment and Decision Making"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
decision making 57 Theorie 26 Theory 25 heuristics 20 recognition heuristic 20 Decision 19 Entscheidung 19 choice 19 judgment 19 decision-making 18 individual differences 16 affect 14 emotion 13 risk 13 framing 12 numeracy 12 prospect theory 11 risk perception 11 uncertainty 11 maximizing 10 coherence 9 intuition 9 regret 9 risky choice 9 Rechnungswesen 8 judgment and decision making 8 overconfidence 8 risk aversion 8 Accounting 7 Decision theory 7 Entscheidungstheorie 7 Wirtschaftsprüfung 7 cooperation 7 correspondence 7 intertemporal choice 7 methodology 7 moral judgment 7 negotiation 7 recognition 7 satisficing 7
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 476 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Article 519 Book / Working Paper 9
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Aufsatz im Buch 15 Book section 15 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Collection of articles of several authors 3 Sammelwerk 3 Article 2
Language
All
English 328 Undetermined 200
Author
All
Slovic, Paul 10 Rozin, Paul 9 Hilbig, Benjamin E. 8 Zeelenberg, Marcel 8 Andersson, Patric 7 Glockner, Andreas 7 Birnbaum, Michael H. 6 Eriksson, Kimmo 6 Marewski, Julian N. 6 McElroy, Todd 6 Ganzach, Yoav 5 Hanoch, Yaniv 5 Miron-Shatz, Talya 5 Peters, Ellen 5 Shavit, Tal 5 Weber, Elke U. 5 Benzion, Uri 4 Budescu, David V. 4 Dehghani, Morteza 4 Dickert, Stephan 4 Fox, Craig R. 4 Gaissmaier, Wolfgang 4 Ginges, Jeremy 4 Glöckner, Andreas 4 Hoffrage, Ulrich 4 Johnson, Joseph G. 4 Keren, Gideon 4 Krantz, David H. 4 Lee, Michael D. 4 Moore, Don A. 4 Newell, Ben R. 4 Peer, Eyal 4 Rubaltelli, Enrico 4 Simpson, Brent 4 Svenson, Ola 4 Ubel, Peter A. 4 Ashton, Robert H. 3 Atran, Scott 3 Ayal, Shahar 3 Bar-Hillel, Maya 3
more ... less ...
Published in...
All
Judgment and Decision Making 474 Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 30 Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 9 Expertise in credit granting : studies on judgment and decision-making behavior 6 Cambridge series on judgment and decision making 3 Poster Session, Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting 2 Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,” in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1 Society for judgment and decision making series 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
RePEc 472 ECONIS (ZBW) 52 EconStor 2 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 461 - 470 of 528
Cover Image
Amos Tversky's contributions to legal scholarship: Remarks at the BDRM session in honor of Amos Tversky, June 16, 2006
Brest, Paul - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) November, pp. 174-178
Together with his long-time colleague Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, provided the intellectual infrastructure for contemporary behavioral law and economics. Prospect theory undermines the Coase Theorem, which is the bedrock of traditional law and economics; and the heuristics and biases research...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773052
Saved in:
Cover Image
Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler's fallacy
Sundali, James; Croson, Rachel - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) July, pp. 1-12
We examine two departures of individual perceptions of randomness from probability theory: the hot hand and the gambler's fallacy, and their respective opposites. This paper's first contribution is to use data from the field (individuals playing roulette in a casino) to demonstrate the existence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773059
Saved in:
Cover Image
Can avoidance of complications lead to biased healthcare decisions?
Amsterlaw, Jennifer; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian; Fagerlin, Angela - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) July, pp. 64-75
Imagine that you have just received a colon cancer diagnosis and need to choose between two different surgical treatments. One surgery, the ``complicated surgery,'' has a lower mortality rate (16\% vs.\ 20\%) but compared to the other surgery, the ``uncomplicated surgery,'' also carries an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773068
Saved in:
Cover Image
The influence of the ratio bias phenomenon on the elicitation of health states utilities
Pinto-Prades, Jose-Luis; Martinez-Perez, Jorge-Eduardo; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) November, pp. 118-133
This paper tests whether logically equivalent risk formats can lead to different health state utilities elicited by means of the traditional standard gamble (SG) method and a modified version of the method that we call ``double lottery.'' We compare utilities for health states elicited when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773075
Saved in:
Cover Image
A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion
Gal, David - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) July, pp. 23-32
The principle of loss aversion is thought to explain a wide range of anomalous phenomena involving tradeoffs between losses and gains. In this article, I show that the anomalies loss aversion was introduced to explain --- the risky bet premium, the endowment effect, and the status-quo bias ---...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773077
Saved in:
Cover Image
Counterfactual thinking and regulatory fit
Markman, Keith D.; McMullen, Matthew N.; Elizaga, Ronald A. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) November, pp. 98-107
According to regulatory fit theory (Higgins, 2000), when people make decisions with strategies that sustain their regulatory focus orientation, they ``feel right'' about what they are doing, and this ``feeling-right'' experience then transfers to subsequent choices, decisions, and evaluations....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773081
Saved in:
Cover Image
It must be awful for them: Healthy people overlook disease variability in quality of life judgments.
Lacey, Heather P.; Fagerlin, Angela; Loewenstein, George; … - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) November, pp. 146-152
When survey respondents rate the quality of life (QoL) associated with a health condition, they must not only evaluate the health condition itself, but must also interpret the meaning of the rating scale in order to assign a specific value. The way that respondents approach this task depends on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773087
Saved in:
Cover Image
Making decision research useful - not just rewarding
Brown, Rex V. - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) November, pp. 162-173
An experienced decision aider reflects on how misaligned priorities produce decision research that is less useful than it could be. Scientific interest and professional standing may motivate researchers --- and their funders and publishers --- more powerfully than concern to help people make...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773090
Saved in:
Cover Image
Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men?
Harris, Christine R.; Jenkins, Michael; Glaser, Dale - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) July, pp. 48-63
Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773103
Saved in:
Cover Image
"Decisions from experience" = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004)
Fox, Craig R.; Hadar, Liat - In: Judgment and Decision Making 1 (2006) November, pp. 159-161
According to prospect theory, people overweight low probability events and underweight high probability events. Several recent papers (notably, Hertwig, Barron, Weber \& Erev, 2004) have argued that although this pattern holds for ``description-based'' decisions, in which people are explicitly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773112
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...