EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: isPartOf:"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
Experiment 278 Decision 134 Entscheidung 134 Consumer behaviour 109 Konsumentenverhalten 109 Theorie 94 Theory 94 Ethics 93 Personality psychology 89 Persönlichkeitspsychologie 89 Organizational behaviour 88 Verhalten in Organisationen 88 Arbeitsgruppe 86 Arbeitsverhalten 86 Team 86 Work behaviour 86 Ethik 84 Emotion 81 Motivation 68 Cognition 67 Confidence 67 Kognition 67 Social behaviour 64 Soziales Verhalten 64 Vertrauen 62 Business ethics 60 Unternehmensethik 60 Social relations 59 Soziale Beziehungen 59 Behavioral economics 58 Verhaltensökonomik 58 Führungsstil 54 Leadership style 54 Creativity 53 Decision theory 50 Entscheidungstheorie 50 Führungskräfte 50 Job performance 50 Managers 50 Leistungsmotivation 49
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Undetermined 2,141 Free 10
Type of publication
All
Article 2,753 Book / Working Paper 14
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Article in journal 874 Aufsatz in Zeitschrift 874 Collection of articles of several authors 6 Sammelwerk 6 Aufsatzsammlung 3 Case study 1 Fallstudie 1
more ... less ...
Language
All
Undetermined 1,849 English 918
Author
All
Gino, Francesca 40 Schweitzer, Maurice E. 30 Neale, Margaret A. 28 Bazerman, Max H. 26 Moore, Don A. 23 Northcraft, Gregory B. 23 Galinsky, Adam D. 22 Budescu, David V. 20 Hollenbeck, John R. 19 Mayer, David M. 17 Yates, J. Frank 17 Brockner, Joel 16 Kouchaki, Maryam 16 Rapoport, Amnon 16 Zeelenberg, Marcel 16 Ariely, Dan 15 Conlon, Donald E. 15 Sniezek, Janet A. 15 Thau, Stefan 15 Thompson, Leigh 15 Birnbaum, Michael H. 14 Dijk, Eric van 14 Hsee, Christopher K. 14 Ilies, Remus 14 Milkman, Katherine L. 14 Argote, Linda 13 Baron, Jonathan 13 Chen, Xiao-Ping 13 Grant, Adam M. 13 Ilgen, Daniel R. 13 Judge, Timothy A. 13 Loewenstein, George 13 Wiltermuth, Scott S. 13 Aquino, Karl 12 Connolly, Terry 12 Keren, Gideon 12 Knippenberg, Daan van 12 Kray, Laura J. 12 Ritov, Ilana 12 Arkes, Hal R. 11
more ... less ...
Institution
All
Gender Audits Forecasting Collaboration 1
Published in...
All
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1,665 Organizational behavior and human decision processes : a journal of fundamental research and theory in applied psychology 1,073 Organizational behavior and human decision processes 26 Leonhardt, J. M. & Pechmann, C. (2021). Is This Product Easy to Control? Liabilities of Using Difficult-To-Pronounce Product Names. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 90-102 1 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 110-120, 2015 1 in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1
Source
All
RePEc 1,665 ECONIS (ZBW) 917 OLC EcoSci 183 USB Cologne (EcoSocSci) 2
Showing 481 - 490 of 2,767
Cover Image
Choosing between options associated with past and future regret
Shani, Yaniv; Danziger, Shai; Zeelenberg, Marcel - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 107-114
People sometimes choose between options associated with already-missed and to-be-missed counterfactuals, or put differently, between past and future regret. We find that these objectively irrelevant associations systematically sway peoples’ choices. Results show participants prefer options...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116184
Saved in:
Cover Image
The effect of specific and general rules on ethical decisions
Mulder, Laetitia B.; Jordan, Jennifer; Rink, Floor - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 115-129
We examined the effects of specific and general rules on ethical decisions and demonstrated, across five studies, that specifically-framed rules elicited ethical decisions more strongly than generally-framed rules. The effectiveness of specific rules was explained by reductions in people’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116185
Saved in:
Cover Image
Poker-faced morality: Concealing emotions leads to utilitarian decision making
Lee, Jooa Julia; Gino, Francesca - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 49-64
This paper examines how making deliberate efforts to regulate aversive affective responses influences people’s decisions in moral dilemmas. We hypothesize that emotion regulation—mainly suppression and reappraisal—will encourage utilitarian choices in emotionally charged contexts and that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116186
Saved in:
Cover Image
Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust
Levine, Emma E.; Schweitzer, Maurice E. - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 88-106
Philosophers, psychologists, and economists have long asserted that deception harms trust. We challenge this claim. Across four studies, we demonstrate that deception can increase trust. Specifically, prosocial lies increase the willingness to pass money in the trust game, a behavioral measure...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116187
Saved in:
Cover Image
Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals
Ganegoda, Deshani B.; Folger, Robert - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 27-36
The majority of organizational justice research is underscored by the assumption that individuals form justice perceptions based on deliberate processing of information, using various justice judgment criteria. Taking an alternative view, this research examined how individuals form fairness...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116188
Saved in:
Cover Image
Corporations are Cyborgs: Organizations elicit anger but not sympathy when they can think but cannot feel
Rai, Tage S.; Diermeier, Daniel - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 18-26
Across four experiments, participants saw companies as capable of having ‘agentic’ mental states, such as having intentions, but incapable of having ‘experiential’ mental states, such as feeling pain. This difference in mental state ascription caused companies to elicit anger as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116189
Saved in:
Cover Image
Managers versus co-workers as referents: Comparing social influence effects on within- and outside-subsidiary knowledge sharing
Boh, Wai Fong; Wong, Sze-Sze - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 1-17
This study uses a social influence lens to examine how key social referents influence individuals’ knowledge sharing behaviors within and outside their subsidiaries. Using a multiple-survey research design, our empirical study shows that unit managers and co-workers act as key social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116190
Saved in:
Cover Image
Unlocking integrative potential: Expressed emotional ambivalence and negotiation outcomes
Rothman, Naomi B.; Northcraft, Gregory B. - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 65-76
This paper examines how one negotiator’s expressed emotional ambivalence can foster integrative outcomes. Study 1 demonstrated that observing a negotiation partner’s emotional ambivalence leads negotiators to come up with more integrative agreements. Study 2 examined a proposed mechanism:...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116191
Saved in:
Cover Image
Turning shame into creativity: The importance of exposure to creative team environments
González-Gómez, Helena V.; Richter, Andreas W. - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 142-161
We draw on the functionalist perspective of emotions (Keltner & Gross, 1999) in order to propose that ashamed employees engage in creative activity as a way to restore their positive self-image. We also propose that the shame–creativity relation is strongest if employees expose themselves via...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116192
Saved in:
Cover Image
Forgiveness is not always divine: When expressing forgiveness makes others avoid you
Adams, Gabrielle S.; Zou, Xi; Inesi, M. Ena; Pillutla, … - In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126 (2015) C, pp. 130-141
Organizational scholars have recently become interested in forgiveness as a way to resolve workplace conflicts and repair relationships. We question the assumption that forgiveness always has these relational benefits. In three studies we investigated participants’ responses to people who...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116193
Saved in:
  • First
  • Prev
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • Next
  • Last
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...