EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: subject:"General aggregation theory"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
general aggregation theory 6 probabilistic opinion pooling 6 Bayesian epistemology 5 Neue politische Ökonomie 5 Public choice 5 Richard Bradley 5 Theorie 5 Theory 5 General aggregation theory 4 Sen's liberal paradox 4 Aggregation 3 Arrow’s impossibility theorem 3 Liberalism 3 Liberalismus 3 Probabilistic opinion pooling 3 Social welfare function 3 Soziale Wohlfahrtsfunktion 3 expert rights 3 finite anonymity 3 liberal rights 3 measure problem 3 multiple priors 3 non-standard analysis 3 society of mind 3 ultrafilter 3 unanimity 3 Arrow's impossibility theorem 2 Bayes-Statistik 2 Bayesian inference 2 Expert rights 2 Experten 2 Experts 2 Finite anonymity 2 Impossibility theorem 2 Liberal rights 2 Measure problem 2 Multiple priors 2 Non-standard analysis 2 Probability theory 2 Society of mind 2
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 5 Undetermined 4
Type of publication
All
Book / Working Paper 6 Article 4
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Working Paper 4 Article in journal 3 Aufsatz in Zeitschrift 3 Arbeitspapier 2 Graue Literatur 2 Non-commercial literature 2
Language
All
English 7 Undetermined 3
Author
All
Herzberg, Frederik 9 Kretz, Claudio 1
Institution
All
Institut für Mathematische Wirtschaftsforschung, Universität Bielefeld 2
Published in...
All
Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 2 Working Papers / Institut für Mathematische Wirtschaftsforschung, Universität Bielefeld 2 Working papers / Universität Bielefeld, Center for Mathematical Economics (IMW) 2 Economics letters 1 Institute of Mathematical Economics Working Paper 1 Journal of economic theory 1 Theory and Decision 1 Theory and decision : an international journal for multidisciplinary advances in decision science 1
more ... less ...
Source
All
ECONIS (ZBW) 5 RePEc 3 EconStor 2
Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Cover Image
Consistent rights on property spaces
Kretz, Claudio - In: Journal of economic theory 197 (2021), pp. 1-36
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012815411
Saved in:
Cover Image
Aggregating infinitely many probability measures
Herzberg, Frederik - 2014
The problem of how to rationally aggregate probability measures occurs in particular (i) when a group of agents, each holding probabilistic beliefs, needs to rationalise a collective decision on the basis of a single 'aggregate belief system' and (ii) when an individual whose belief system is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010352824
Saved in:
Cover Image
Respect for experts or respect for unanimity? The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
Herzberg, Frederik - 2014
Amartya Sen (1970) has shown that three natural desiderata for social choice rules are inconsistent: universal domain, respect for unanimity, and respect for some minimal rights - which can be interpreted as either expert rights or liberal rights. Dietrich and List (2008) have generalised this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010427176
Saved in:
Cover Image
Aggregating infinitely many probability measures
Herzberg, Frederik - Institut für Mathematische Wirtschaftsforschung, … - 2014
The problem of how to rationally aggregate probability measures occurs in particular (i) when a group of agents, each holding probabilistic beliefs, needs to rationalise a collective decision on the basis of a single ‘aggregate belief system’ and (ii) when an individual whose belief system...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011098634
Saved in:
Cover Image
Respect for experts or respect for unanimity? The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
Herzberg, Frederik - Institut für Mathematische Wirtschaftsforschung, … - 2014
Amartya Sen (1970) has shown that three natural desiderata for social choice rules are inconsistent: universal domain, respect for unanimity, and respect for some minimal rights — which can be interpreted as either expert rights or liberal rights. Dietrich and List (2008) have generalised this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010897079
Saved in:
Cover Image
Aggregating infinitely many probability measures
Herzberg, Frederik - 2014
The problem of how to rationally aggregate probability measures occurs in particular (i) when a group of agents, each holding probabilistic beliefs, needs to rationalise a collective decision on the basis of a single 'aggregate belief system' and (ii) when an individual whose belief system is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010234048
Saved in:
Cover Image
Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity : the liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
Herzberg, Frederik - In: Economics letters 151 (2017), pp. 44-47
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011742130
Saved in:
Cover Image
Aggregating infinitely many probability measures
Herzberg, Frederik - In: Theory and Decision 78 (2015) 2, pp. 319-337
The problem of how to rationally aggregate probability measures occurs in particular (i) when a group of agents, each holding probabilistic beliefs, needs to rationalise a collective decision on the basis of a single ‘aggregate belief system’ and (ii) when an individual whose belief system...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011154918
Saved in:
Cover Image
Aggregating infinitely many probability measures
Herzberg, Frederik - In: Theory and decision : an international journal for … 78 (2015) 2, pp. 319-337
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010513810
Saved in:
Cover Image
Respect for experts or respect for unanimity? : the liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
Herzberg, Frederik - 2014 - Preliminary and incompletet
Amartya Sen (1970) has shown that three natural desiderata for social choice rules are inconsistent: universal domain, respect for unanimity, and respect for some minimal rights - which can be interpreted as either expert rights or liberal rights. Dietrich and List (2008) have generalised this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010366140
Saved in:
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...