Search Results - subject:"Procedural fairness$"

Purely Procedural Preferences - Beyond Procedural Equity and Reciprocity

Chlass, Nadine; Güth, Werner; Miettinen, Topi - The Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics and … - 2009

Most research in economics models agents somehow motivated by outcomes. Here, we model agents motivated by procedures instead, where procedures are defined independently of an outcome. To that end, we design procedures which yield the same expected outcomes or carry the same information on...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005014557

Promoting Justice by Treating People Unequally: An Experimental Study

Becker, Alice; Miller, Luis M. - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, … - 2009

Which inequalities among individuals are considered unjust? This paper reports the results of an experiment designed to study distributive choices dealing with arbitrarily unequal initial endowments. In a three-person distribution problem where subjects either know or do not know their...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005031996

On Understanding the Human Nature of Good and Bad Behavior in Business: A Behavioral Ethics Approach

Cremer, D. de - Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM … - 2009

by my own research addressing how sanctioning and regulation systems affect behavior, the benefits of procedural fairness …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484228

Does Participation Increase Outcome Acceptance? Evidence from a Power-to-take Experiment

Mertins, Vanessa; Albert, Max - In: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 235 (2015) 6, pp. 584-607

Summary It is often conjectured that participatory decision making may increase acceptance, especially of unfavorable decisions. The present paper tests this conjecture in a three-person power-to-take experiment. Two takers decide which fraction of the responder’s endowment to transfer to...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014609548

An Examination of the Effect of CEO Social Ties and CEO Reputation on Nonprofessional Investors’ Say-on-Pay Judgments

Kaplan, Steven; Samuels, Janet; Cohen, Jeffrey - In: Journal of Business Ethics 126 (2015) 1, pp. 103-117

CEO compensation has received much attention from both academics and regulators. However, academics have given scant attention to understanding judgments about CEO compensation by third parties such as investors. Our study contributes to the ethics literature on CEO compensation by examining...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011155325

The effects of nonfinancial performance measures on role clarity, procedural fairness and managerial performance

Lau, Chong M. - In: Pacific Accounting Review 27 (2015) 2, pp. 142-165

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to ascertain if it is procedural fairness, or role clarity, or both procedural … and procedural fairness may mediate the relationship between performance measures and managerial performance. Design … performance. Surprisingly, procedural fairness has no significant mediating effect on the relationship. Originality/value – To …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014968907

Pirated software : the relationship between factors

Anwar, Norizan; Bahry, Farrah Diana Saiful; Amran, Noraizan - In: Journal of management research 7 (2015) 2, pp. 241-251

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010507678

An examination of the effect of CEO social ties and CEO reputation on nonprofessional investors' say-on-pay judgments

Kaplan, Steven E.; Samuels, Janet A.; Cohen, Jeffrey - In: Journal of business ethics : JOBE 126 (2015) 1, pp. 103-117

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010476634

Does participation increase outcome acceptance? : evidence from a power-to-take experiment

Mertins, Vanessa; Albert, Max - In: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 235 (2015) 6, pp. 584-607

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011431905

Procedural fairness and taxpayers' response : evidence from an experiment

Jun, Byung-hill; Cho, Myeonghwan; Park, Myungho - In: The Korean economic review 31 (2015) 2, pp. 301-326

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011417838