EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: subject:"VILLAGE CHARACTERISTICS"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
IMPACT EVALUATION 2 INCOME 2 INTERVENTION 2 LEARNING 2 POVERTY REDUCTION 2 PROGRAMS 2 TARGETING 2 VILLAGE CHARACTERISTICS 2 ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAM 1 ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS 1 BENEFICIARIES 1 CONTROL GROUPS 1 CORRUPTION 1 COUNTERFACTUAL 1 EVALUATION RESULTS 1 EX POST EVALUATION 1 HOUSEHOLD INCOME 1 HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS 1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS 1 INTERMEDIATE INDICATORS 1 LIVING STANDARDS 1 LONGITUDINAL DATA 1 NGO 1 OUTCOME INDICATORS 1 POVERTY MEASURES 1 PROGRAM EFFECTS 1 PROGRAM EVALUATION 1 SELECTION BIAS 1 TREATMENT EFFECTS 1 VILLAGES 1 WELFARE LEVELS 1
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
CC license 2 Free 2
Type of publication
All
Article 2
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
research-article 2
Language
All
English 2
Author
All
Ravallion, Martin 2
Published in...
All
The World Bank Economic Review 1 World Bank Research Observer 1
Source
All
Other ZBW resources 2
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Cover Image
Can We Trust Shoestring Evaluations?
Ravallion, Martin - In: The World Bank Economic Review 28 (2014) 3, pp. 413-431
Many more impact evaluations could be done, and at lower unit cost, if evaluators could avoid the need for baseline data using objective socio-economic surveys and rely instead on retrospective subjective questions on how outcomes have changed, asked post-intervention. But would the results be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015360698
Saved in:
Cover Image
Evaluation in the Practice of Development
Ravallion, Martin - In: World Bank Research Observer 24 (2009) 1, pp. 29-53
Standard methods of impact evaluation often leave significant gaps between what we know about development effectiveness and what we want to know—gaps that stem from distortions in the market for knowledge. The author discusses how evaluations might better address these knowledge gaps and so be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015361138
Saved in:
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...