Search Results - subject:"Voting Methods"

Two types of participation failure under nine voting methods in variable electorates

Felsenthal, Dan S.; Nurmi, Hannu - In: Public choice 168 (2016) 1/2, pp. 115-135

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011659215

Felsenthal, Dan; Tideman, Nicolaus - In: Public Choice 160 (2014) 3, pp. 313-326

A strong Condorcet winner (SCW) is an alternative, x, that a majority of voters rank higher than z, for every other alternative, z. A weak Condorcet winner (WCW) is an alternative, y, that no majority of voters rank below any other alternative, z, but is not a SCW. There has been some confusion...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010987966

Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited

Felsenthal, Dan S.; Tideman, T. Nicolaus - In: Public choice 160 (2014) 3/4, pp. 313-326

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010388671

Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods

Felsenthal, Dan; Tideman, Nicolaus - In: Theory and Decision 75 (2013) 1, pp. 59-77

of characteristics in the voting methods that can exhibit failures of monotonicity. Copyright Springer Science …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010865856

Another Consideration in Minority Vote Dilution Remedies: Rent-Seeking

Lockard, Alan - In: Review of Law & Economics 2 (2007) 3, pp. 5-5

imposing alternative voting methods, such as cumulative voting. I examine several voting methods with regard to their …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005579498