EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: subject:"correspondence experiments"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
Arbeitsmarktdiskriminierung 3 Correspondence experiments 3 Experiment 3 Gender discrimination 3 Labour market discrimination 3 Personalbeschaffung 3 Recruitment 3 correspondence experiments 3 Feldforschung 2 Field research 2 Gender 2 Geschlecht 2 Geschlechterdiskriminierung 2 Lohnstruktur 2 Unobserved heterogeneity 2 Wage structure 2 correspondence tests 2 discrimination 2 field experiments 2 gender discrimination 2 hiring 2 unobserved heterogeneity 2 Employee appraisal 1 Personalbeurteilung 1
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 5 Undetermined 1
Type of publication
All
Book / Working Paper 5 Article 1
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Working Paper 4 Arbeitspapier 2 Graue Literatur 2 Non-commercial literature 2 Article 1 Article in journal 1 Aufsatz in Zeitschrift 1 Systematic review 1 Übersichtsarbeit 1
more ... less ...
Language
All
English 6
Author
All
Baert, Stijn 6
Published in...
All
Discussion paper series / IZA 1 Economics : the open-access, open-assessment e-journal 1 Economics : the open-access, open-assessment journal 1 Economics Discussion Papers 1 Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 1 IZA Discussion Papers 1
Source
All
ECONIS (ZBW) 3 EconStor 3
Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Cover Image
Hiring Discrimination: An Overview of (Almost) All Correspondence Experiments Since 2005
Baert, Stijn - 2017
This chapter aims to provide an exhaustive list of all (i.e. 90) correspondence studies on hiring discrimination that were conducted between 2005 and 2016 (and could be found through a systematic search). For all these studies, the direction of the estimated treatment effects is tabulated. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011653466
Saved in:
Cover Image
Hiring discrimination : an overview of (almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005
Baert, Stijn - 2017
This chapter aims to provide an exhaustive list of all (i.e. 90) correspondence studies on hiring discrimination that were conducted between 2005 and 2016 (and could be found through a systematic search). For all these studies, the direction of the estimated treatment effects is tabulated. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011647538
Saved in:
Cover Image
Field experimental evidence on gender discrimination in hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman predicted?
Baert, Stijn - 2015
Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011279471
Saved in:
Cover Image
Field experimental evidence on gender discrimination in hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman predicted?
Baert, Stijn - In: Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 9 (2015) 2015-25, pp. 1-11
Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011314039
Saved in:
Cover Image
Field experimental evidence on gender discrimination in hiring : biased as Heckman and Siegelman predicted?
Baert, Stijn - 2015
Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011280058
Saved in:
Cover Image
Field experimental evidence on gender discrimination in hiring : biased as Heckman and Siegelman predicted?
Baert, Stijn - 2015
Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011312754
Saved in:
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...