Search Results - subject:"doctrinal paradox"

The geometry of consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation

Pivato, Marcus - Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, … - 2008

Given a set of propositions with unknown truth values, a `judgement aggregation rule' is a way to aggregate the personal truth-valuations of a set of jurors into some `collective' truth valuation. We introduce the class of `quasimajoritarian' judgement aggregation rules, which includes majority...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005616992

A GENERALIZED MODEL OF JUDGMENT AND PREFERENCE AGGREGATION

Beg, Ismat; Rashid, Tabasam - In: Fuzzy Economic Review XVIII (2013) 1, pp. 9-27

Some basic notions of fuzzy logic for trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are extended. Purpose of these extensions is to give a generalized model of judgment and preference aggregation by using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Examples are given to illustrate the proposed technique to optimize the problem by...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010816292

Community standards

Miller, Alan D. - In: Journal of Economic Theory 148 (2013) 6, pp. 2696-2705

unanimity rule. I also explore the relationship between the model and the doctrinal paradox of Kornhauser and Sager [12]. …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011043039

Community standards

Miller, Alan D. - In: Journal of economic theory 148 (2013) 6, pp. 2696-2705

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010257903

A generalized model of judgment and preference aggregation

Beg, Ismat; Rashid, Tabasam - In: Fuzzy economic review : the review of the International … 18 (2013) 1, pp. 9-27

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010360167

Premise-Based versus Outcome-Based Information Aggregation

de Clippel, Geoffroy; Eliaz, Kfir - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2012

A group of rational individuals with common interest need to select one of two outcomes. The optimal decision depends on whether certain premises or pieces of evidence are established as being true, and each member receives a noisy signal of the truth value of the relevant premises. Should the...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011083847

The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory

Mongin, Philippe - In: Theory and Decision 73 (2012) 3, pp. 315-355

Kornhauser and Sager’s doctrinal paradox and List and Pettit’s discursive dilemma, two problems that we distinguish emphatically … here. The current theory has developed from the discursive dilemma, rather than the doctrinal paradox, and the final …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010865852

An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory

Mongin, Philippe; Dietrich, Franz - HEC Paris (École des Hautes Études Commerciales) - 2011

Kornhauser and Sager’s doctrinal paradox and Pettit’s discursive dilemma, two problems that we distinguish emphatically here. The … current theory has developed from the discursive dilemma, rather than the doctrinal paradox, and the final aim of the paper is …; and finally the recent extension mentioned above to the doctrinal paradox. …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011031659

Judgment aggregation

Mongin, Philippe - HEC Paris (École des Hautes Études Commerciales) - 2011

formalizes judgment by a logical syntax. The theory derives from Kornhauser and Sager’s doctrinal paradox and Pettit’s discursive …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010832946

The premiss-based approach to logical aggregation

MONGIN, Philippe; DIETRICH, Franz - HEC Paris (École des Hautes Études Commerciales) - 2007

In this paper, the authors investigate judgment aggregation by assuming that some formulas of the agenda are singled out as premisses, and the Independence condition (formula-wise aggregation) holds for them, though perhaps not for others.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005106603