EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • A-Z
  • Beta
  • About EconBiz
  • News
  • Thesaurus (STW)
  • Academic Skills
  • Help
  •  My account 
    • Logout
    • Change account settings
  • Login
EconBiz - Find Economic Literature
Publications Events
Search options
Advanced Search history
My EconBiz
Favorites Loans Reservations Fines
    You are here:
  • Home
  • Search: subject:"fundamental normative relativity"
Narrow search

Narrow search

Year of publication
Subject
All
balancing 2 compensation 2 deterrence 2 eye tracking 2 fundamental normative relativity 2 machine learning 2 torts 2 utilitarianand deontological concerns 2 Artificial intelligence 1 Gerechtigkeit 1 Haftung 1 Justice 1 Künstliche Intelligenz 1 Liability 1 Visual perception 1 Visuelle Wahrnehmung 1
more ... less ...
Online availability
All
Free 2
Type of publication
All
Book / Working Paper 2
Type of publication (narrower categories)
All
Working Paper 2 Arbeitspapier 1 Graue Literatur 1 Non-commercial literature 1
Language
All
English 2
Author
All
Engel, Christoph 2 Rahal, Rima Maria 1 Rahal, Rima-Maria 1
Published in...
All
Discussion Papers of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 1 Discussion papers of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 1
Source
All
ECONIS (ZBW) 1 EconStor 1
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Cover Image
Justice is in the eyes of the beholder: Eye tracking evidence on balancing normative concerns in torts cases
Engel, Christoph; Rahal, Rima Maria - 2020
Frequently deciding legal cases requires an assessment in multiple, conceptually incompatible dimensions. Often one normative concern would call for one decision, and another normative concern for a different decision. The decision-maker must engage in balancing, with no help from overarching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012428600
Saved in:
Cover Image
Justice is in the eyes of the beholder : eye tracking evidence on balancing normative concerns in torts cases
Engel, Christoph; Rahal, Rima-Maria - 2020
Frequently deciding legal cases requires an assessment in multiple, conceptually incompatible dimensions. Often one normative concern would call for one decision, and another normative concern for a different decision. The decision-maker must engage in balancing, with no help from overarching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012153406
Saved in:
A service of the
zbw
  • Sitemap
  • Plain language
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Imprint
  • Privacy

Loading...