Showing 1 - 10 of 13
This paper presents a model of public debate in which experts attempt to influence public policy by making recommendations about controversial issues. However the decision to become an expert is taken to be endogenous, and consequently depends on the potential expert's bias. Under certain...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012236046
Risk averse agents who engage in risky production activities frequently participate in some sort of arrangement to share risk. When there are issues of moral hazard, optimal risk sharing typically involves spreading risk over time as well as over space. Agents who suffer bad outcomes can spread...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012236047
This paper presents a model of public debate in which experts attempt to influence public policy by making recommendations about controversial issues. However the decision to become an expert is taken to be endogenous, and consequently depends on the potential expert's bias. Under certain...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005588497
Risk averse agents who engage in risky production activities frequently participate in some sort of arrangement to share risk. When there are issues of moral hazard, optimal risk sharing typically involves spreading risk over time as well as over space. Agents who suffer bad outcomes can spread...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005824651
The debate over standards versus rules has been framed as a trade-off between the certainty and lower administrative costs of rules versus the greater flexibility to base decisions on case-specific evidence with standards. In this paper, we argue that even if judges have no ability to directly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014177881
We build a model of innovation and patent adjudication under two forms of uncertainty; uncertainty regarding whether the original invention merits protection (non-obviousness), and uncertainty as to whether a particular competitor's product should be barred (infringement). We find that when it...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014103864
In liability insurance, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to cover. Thus it is possible that an insurer that has a duty to defend a suit may not have the duty to cover the policyholder's liabilities in the suit. However, if the penalty for a breach of the duty to defend is limited to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012962837
Imagine a pedestrian and driver both approaching a crosswalk. Both parties can take actions to prevent an accident, and traditional economic analysis of tort law recognizes the importance of making sure that both parties have an incentive to do so. However, traditional negligence rules can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012954047
When liability insurance carries a limit that is smaller than the potential claim of a third party plaintiff, the insurer and the insured can have a conflict of interest as to settlement. The majority of jurisdictions in the United States impose upon insurers a duty to ignore liability limits...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013029843
Traditional analyses of competition policy assume that firms operate in perfect credit markets. We argue that imperfections in credit markets should be taken into account, and show one channel by which accounting for financial conditions could alter the welfare effects of a merger. In line with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013147034