Showing 1 - 10 of 51
This paper studies the role of transfers among groups within a country as well as among countries in a two level game of international trade negotiations. We show that in order to realize the intended transfer in the presence of asymmetric information on the states of recipients (and donors), a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003103117
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002962428
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002708734
PTAs are generally negotiated without any tariff concessions or transfers to non-member countries. Can such a PTA benefit the neighbors' welfare? In a two-good competitive equilibrium model in the absence of an entrepôt, a PTA without concessions to the outside will hurt the outsider's welfare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014220595
This paper assesses the economic conditions for Asian countries to cope with the formation of EU and NAFTA. Is it desirable for them to form their own trading area? And, if desirable, is it better to have a closed one like the EAEC or a more open one like the APEC? Relying on public economics...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013218815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009727055
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003082453
The Lerner paradox is the possibility that a tariff on an import good might worsen a country's terms of trade, and the Metzler paradox is the possibility that a tariff on an import good might reduce a country’s import price. In a general equilibrium framework with multiple goods, this paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003809740
PTAs are generally negotiated without any tariff concessions or transfers to non-member countries. Can such a PTA benefit the neighbors’ welfare? In a two-good competitive equilibrium model in the absence of an entrepôt, a PTA without concessions to the outside will hurt the outsider’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003811034
This paper examines the role of misleading economic ideas that most likely promoted the economic disasters of the two deflationary periods in Japanese economic history. Misleading ideas deepened the depression during the interwar years, and erroneous thinking prolonged the stagnation of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011607713