Showing 1 - 10 of 82
For any abstract bargaining problem a non-cooperative one stage strategic game is constructed whose unique dominant strategies Nash equilibrium implements the Nash solution of the bargaining problem. -- Nash programm ; implementation ; Nash bargaining solution
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009697464
These notes consist of two parts. In the first one I present a counter example to Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013). In the second part I propose a correction based on an axiom similar to one used by Salonen (1988) in the first axomatization of the Discrete Raiffa solution.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009682620
This paper provides four axioms that uniquely characterize the sequential Raiffa solution proposed by Raiffa (1951, 1953) for two-person bargaining games. Three of these axioms are standard and are shared by several popular bargaining solutions. They suffice to characterize these solutions on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003944553
This article provides an exact non-cooperative foundation of the sequential Raiffa solution for two person bargaining games. Based on an approximate foundation due to Myerson (1997) for any two-person bargaining game (S,d) an extensive form game G^S^d is defined that has an infinity of weakly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003944582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001597333
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001597339
Game Theory describes human interaction involving conflict, cooperation and competition, the term Interpersonal Decision Theory is synonymous. The term reflects the fact that most essential features of this field are manifested in parlor games. This topic-level treatment covers large parts of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001671143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002453947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013489669
These notes consist of two parts. In the first one I present a counter example to Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013). In the second part I propose a correction based on an axiom similar to one used by Salonen (1988) in the first axiomatization of the Discrete Raiffa solution
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013097747