Showing 1 - 10 of 258
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003983809
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009578820
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011301878
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011301879
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011301880
The paper proposes a way to measure mechanical and psychological effects of majority runoff versus plurality electoral systems in candidate elections. Building on a series of laboratory experiments, we evaluate these effects with respect to the probability of electing a Condorcet winner...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010852305
We report on laboratory experiments on voting. In a setting where subjects have single-peaked preferences we find that the rational choice theory provides very good predictions of actual individual behavior in one-round and approval voting elections, but fares poorly in explaining vote choice...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008511625
The paper proposes a way to measure the mechanical and psychological effects of majority runoff versus plurality. Building on a series of laboratory experiments on presidential-type elections, we evaluate these effects with respect to the probability of election of a centrist candidate. In our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008914757
The paper proposes a way to measure mechanical and psychological effects of majority runoff versus plurality electoral systems in candidate elections. Building on a series of laboratory experiments, we evaluate these effects with respect to the probability of electing a Condorcet winner...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010714013
We report on laboratory experiments on voting. In a setting where subjects have single-peaked preferences we find that the rational choice theory provides very good predictions of actual individual behavior in one-round and approval voting elections, but fares poorly in explaining vote choice...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008465255