Showing 1 - 10 of 160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873796
A large body of experimental research has demonstrated that, on average, people violate the axioms of expected utility theory as well as of discounted utility theory. In particular, aggregate behavior is best characterized by probability distortions and hyperbolic discounting. But is it the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008677113
A large body of experimental research has demonstrated that, on average, people violate the axioms of expected utility theory as well as of discounted utility theory. In particular, aggregate behavior is best characterized by probability distortions and hyperbolic discounting. But is it the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013137702
Future events are uncertain by their very nature. Therefore, people's risk preferences are likely to play a role in the valuation of allegedly guaranteed future outcomes. We show that future uncertainty conjointly with people's proneness to nonlinear probability weighting generates a unifying...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013159163
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008989101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873791
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873799
How does risk tolerance vary with stake size? This important question cannot be adequately answered if framing effects, nonlinear probability weighting, and heterogeneity of preference types are neglected. We show that the increase in relative risk aversion over gains cannot be captured by the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207349
It has long been recognized that there is considerable heterogeneity in individual risk taking behavior but little is known about the distribution of risk taking types. We present a parsimonious characterization of risk taking behavior by estimating a finite mixture regression model for three...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207351
How does risk tolerance vary with stake size? This important question cannot be adequately answered if framing effects, nonlinear probability weighting, and heterogeneity of preference types are neglected. We show that, contrary to gains, no coherent change in relative risk aversion is observed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315543