Showing 1 - 10 of 1,014
NAFTA’s investment treaty has led to several expropriation compensation claims from investors hurt by new environmental regulations. Expropriation clauses in international treaties solve post-investment moral hazard problems such as hold-ups. However, these clauses can interact with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011130808
In customary international and public law, “takings†resulting from regulations designed to protect the public good are generally excluded from compensation rules; this exclusion is known as a police powers carve-out (PPCO). Increasingly, this PPCO is being challenged, particularly in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010537445
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008592508
International investment agreements in bilateral treaties or free trade agreements allow investors to bring compensation claims when their investments are hurt by new regulations addressing environmental or other social concerns. Compensation rules such as expropriation clauses in international...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008691142
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008771486
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003769139
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003718967
NAFTA's investment treaty has led to several expropriation compensation claims from investors hurt by new environmental regulations. Expropriation clauses in international treaties solve post-investment moral hazard problems such as hold-ups. However, these clauses can interact with National...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014059517
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009493687
The rapid and concurrent increase in both foreign investment and government efforts to attract foreign investment at the end of last century makes the question of causality between the two both interesting and challenging. I take up this question for the case of the nearly 2,500 bilateral...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010676520