Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Most scholars believe the Supreme Court dropped its per se rule against price-fixing in Appalachian Coals (1933), re-instituting that rule in Socony-Vacuum (1940), but that the rule ignored "reasonableness" until BMI (1979), and that Maricopa (1982) relied on Socony to step back from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008542254
With the increased number of firms that are in some form of serious financial distress, once financing becomes more readily available to potential acquirers we might expect an increase in both the number and share of mergers where at least one of the parties is having difficulty staying afloat...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008542268
For decades the fact that input price hikes are passed on faster than input price cuts was thought to be well explained by the assumption that competitive firms fully pass on all input price changes, so they can't price asymmetrically, so asymmetric pricing behavior is limited to oligopolies,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008542293
Xia and Sexton find anti-competitive effects from contracts between meat-packers and ranchers that require delivery of all of a contracting rancher's cattle to the packer it contracted with at the highest price cattle wind up selling for in the spot market (i.e., the "Top-of-the-Market" price)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014195769
Janssen and Rasmusen (2002) show that a Bertrand model with an uncertain number of firms has only one symmetric equilibrium, and profits in that equilibrium fit the empirical data in Bresnahan and Reiss (1991). However, unless its equilibrium is unique, Janssen and Rasmusen's model cannot be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014117250
The share of U.S. consumer food-spending that farmers received (the “farm-share”) fell steadily from 48% in 1913 to 20% by 2000, encouraging repeated investigations of that decline. Similar alarms come from “spreads” between prices that farmers receive and prices that consumers pay....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013123576
For decades the fact that input price hikes are passed on faster than input price cuts was thought to be well explained by the assumption that competitive firms fully pass on all input price changes, so they can't price asymmetrically, so asymmetric pricing behavior is limited to oligopolies,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157974
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009713642
With the increased number of firms that are in some form of serious financial distress, once financing becomes more readily available to potential acquirers we might expect an increase in both the number and share of mergers where at least one of the parties is having difficulty staying afloat...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012718366
Most scholars believe the Supreme Court dropped its per se rule against price-fixing in Appalachian Coals (1933), re-instituting that rule in Socony-Vacuum (1940), but that the rule ignored "reasonableness" until BMI (1979), and that Maricopa (1982) relied on Socony to step back from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012056281