Showing 1 - 10 of 62
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003107663
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014375296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009486014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003676478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003374660
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003878404
While the focus of mainstream economic analysis of liability rules remains on negligence liability, recently some legal scholars have argued for the sharing of liability. In this paper, our first objective is contribute to the debate regarding the desirability of the sharing of liability for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012466036
Food loss remains one of the central points of collective action around the world, as reflected in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, but this issue is far more concerning for the developing countries. Several studies highlight the level and stages of food losses. However, there is limited...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013417477
In this paper we discuss a new tort liability rule, which we call super-symmetric comparative negligence and vigilance. When both injurer and victim in an accident are negligent, it provides for liability shares that depend on the degrees of negligence of the two parties, similar to the standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010284036
A growing body of literature suggests that courts and juries are inclined toward division of liability between two strictly non-negligent or 'vigilant' parties. However, standard models of liability rules do not provide for vigilance-based sharing of liability. In this paper, we explore the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010284040