Showing 1 - 10 of 120
A large body of experimental research has demonstrated that, on average, people violate the axioms of expected utility theory as well as of discounted utility theory. In particular, aggregate behavior is best characterized by probability distortions and hyperbolic discounting. But is it the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013137702
Future events are uncertain by their very nature. Therefore, people's risk preferences are likely to play a role in the valuation of allegedly guaranteed future outcomes. We show that future uncertainty conjointly with people's proneness to nonlinear probability weighting generates a unifying...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013159163
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008989101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873791
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873796
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873799
It has long been recognized that there is considerable heterogeneity in individual risk taking behavior but little is known about the distribution of risk taking types. We present a parsimonious characterization of risk taking behavior by estimating a finite mixture regression model for three...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207351
Standard economic models view risk taking and time discounting as two independent dimensions of decision makers' behavior. However, mounting experimental evidence demonstrates the existence of robust and systematic interaction effects. There are striking parallels in patterns of risk taking and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014163811
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011720640
This paper documents a large association between individuals' time discounting in incentivized experiments and their positions in the real-life wealth distribution derived from Danish high-quality administrative data for a large sample of middle-aged individuals. The association is stable over...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012861715