Showing 1 - 10 of 15
This paper analyzes platforms and rejections in two-sided markets with network externalities, using the specific context of a payment card association. We study the cooperative antitrust determination of the interchange fee by member banks. We use a framework in which banks and merchants may...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002194094
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012798152
This paper analyzes platforms and rejections in two-sided markets with network externalities, using the specific context of a payment card association. We study the cooperative antitrust determination of the interchange fee by member banks. We use a framework in which banks and merchants may...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010332223
Using a simple downstream duopoly model with vertical relations and downstream R&D, we investigate the effect of non-assertion of patents (NAP) provisions. A monopoly upstream firm decides whether to employ NAP provisions. If it does so, it freely incorporates the R&D outcomes into its inputs....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010332488
Abstract This study examined the reasons for the decline in the plaintiff win rate in medical lawsuits in Japan since 1999. The results suggest that the decline in the plaintiff win rate is likely due to the overall shortening of trial periods. In particular, if the trial period is shortened by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014585261
This paper analyzes platforms and rejections in two-sided markets with network externalities, using the specific context of a payment card association. We study the cooperative antitrust determination of the interchange fee by member banks. We use a framework in which banks and merchants may...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004964232
In this paper, we discuss the case of the integration between NSK and Amatsuji Steel Ball by using the successive oligopoly model. We show that the integration does not lead to input foreclosure. However, it leads to customer foreclosure, if the fixed cost of a rival firm in the upstream market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008562793
Using a simple downstream duopoly model with vertical relations and downstream R&D, we investigate the effect of non-assertion of patents (NAP) provisions. A monopoly upstream firm decides whether to employ NAP provisions. If it does so, it freely incorporates the R&D outcomes into its inputs....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009002719
Using a simple downstream duopoly model with vertical relations and downstream R&D, we investigate the effect of non-assertion of patents (NAP) provisions. A monopoly upstream firm decides whether to employ NAP provisions. If it does so, it freely incorporates the R&D outcomes into its inputs....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013126828
Using a simple downstream duopoly model with vertical relations and downstream R&D, we investigate the effect of non-assertion of patents (NAP) provisions. A monopoly upstream firm decides whether to employ NAP provisions. If it does so, it freely incorporates the R&D outcomes into its inputs....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008988881