Showing 1 - 10 of 13
We show that in a class of I‐agent mechanism design problems with evidence, commitment is unnecessary, randomization has no value, and robust incentive compatibility has no cost. In particular, for each agent i, we construct a simple disclosure game between the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012097965
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408834
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005409172
A principal allocates an object to one of I agents. Each agent values receiving the object and has private information regarding the value to the principal of giving it to him. There are no monetary transfers, but the principal can check an agent's information at a cost. A favored-agent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011093391
We extend implementation theory by allowing the social choice function to depend on more than just the preferences of the agents and allowing agents to support their statements with hard evidence. We show that a simple condition on evidence is necessary for the implementation of a social choice...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011042924
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005117509
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005153751
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005159848
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005251053
Consider an exchange economy with asymmetric information. What is the set of outcomes that are consistent with common knowledge of rationality and market clearing?
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010572382