Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012880747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011585104
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011809262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015067491
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015068426
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013166573
This paper discusses and develops an important distinction drawn by Jevons, viz . that between natural and fictitious quantities. This distinction provides a basis for a theory of economic concept formation that aims at picking out families of models that are phenomenally adequate, explanatory...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005496111
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005462901
I respond to some challenges raised by my critics. In particular, I argue in favour of six claims. First, against Alexandrova and Northcott, I point out that to deny the explanatoriness of economic models by assuming an ontic (specifically, causal) conception of explanation is to beg the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011134089
Investigates the economic methodologies of Carl Menger, William Stanley Jevons and Gustav Schmoller with respect to the issue of whether mathematics is or is not an adequate language to express economic relationships. First, Menger’s and Jevons’s respective methodologies are identified as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014862958