Showing 1 - 10 of 84
Dufour and Engle (J. Finance (2000) 2467) find evidence of increased presence of informed traders when the NYSE markets are most active. No such evidence, however, can be found by Manganelli (J. Financial Markets (2005) 377) for the infrequently traded stocks. This article investigates the issue...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004973398
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012160500
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012232960
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014369675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014446719
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014535560
Using transactions and quotes data, we find significant magnet effects of price limit rules in Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSEC). Consistent with Subrahmanyam [Subrahmanyam, A., 1994. Circuit breakers and market volatility: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Finance 49, 237-254], we find that when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005372413
We use transactions data to explore the magnet effects of price limit rules on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE). When limit hits are imminent, stock prices are found to approach the price limits at faster rates, with higher trading intensity and larger price variation, supporting the magnet...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005452980
We show that the probability of information-based trade (PIN) played a significant role in explaining monthly returns on Shanghai A shares over the period 2001 to 2006. In particular, PIN, as approximated by order imbalance as a proportion of total transactions, appears to explain returns even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005006700
Extreme losses caused by leverage and financial derivatives highlight the need to backtest Value-at-Risk (VaR) based on the sizes of tail losses, because the risk measure currently used disregards losses beyond the VaR boundary. While Basel II backtests VaR by counting the number of exceptions,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008494434